Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Proposal]Add StoreGroup feature for aggregating state flow #13

Open
yonekawa opened this issue Dec 4, 2015 · 0 comments
Open

[Proposal]Add StoreGroup feature for aggregating state flow #13

yonekawa opened this issue Dec 4, 2015 · 0 comments

Comments

@yonekawa
Copy link
Owner

yonekawa commented Dec 4, 2015

Redux has very interest concept.
A single state tree makes it easier to debug or introspect an application.
Redux provides undo/redo state easily because the tree managed all state changes.

Before I tried to port Redux features in SwiftFlux.
However, Redux principles are based on single state tree.
Flux dispatches action to multiple stores. Redux does not need Dispatcher.
#10

I think that SwiftFlux needs to a single state tree utility for developer who needs constraint.

@yonekawa yonekawa changed the title [Proposal] Add StoreGroup feature for aggregating state flow [Proposal]Add StoreGroup feature for aggregating state flow Dec 10, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant