-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dependant rows are not hidden if the row they depends are hidden #2171
Comments
One option would be to declare Row C dependent on Row A and in the condition (if you use a function condition) check whether Row B is hidden. Or just replicate the logic to make row C also depend on row A which is not so elegant but will be consistent. |
@mats-claassen Thanks for the reply. As i wanted to implement the dynamic forms C is not aware about the dependancy with A. |
I understand. So Eureka currently does not support transitive dependencies and it also only supports "observing" the So when Row A's value changes,
|
thnaks, will try to implement this. |
I have a use case where lets say there are 3 rows, A, B and C
When i changed the value in row A which then hides the row B, but as Row C depends on B it should also hide.
As Row B is not visible.
Please help me to fix this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: