New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider making the semantics of `extracting` more similar to `having` #533

Open

grodin opened this issue Apr 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Contributor

grodin commented Apr 18, 2024 •

edited

Loading

One thing worth exploring would be to add in addition to/replace extracting with a version of eachHaving that more directly mirrors having
ex:

assertThat(allUsers).eachHaving(User::name).isEqualTo(listOf("Alice", "Bob", "Eve"))

assertThat(allUsers).eachHaving("name") { it.name }.isEqualTo(listOf("Alice", "Bob", "Eve"))

Originally posted by @evant in #521 (comment)

I thought this was worth keeping around as a separate issue.

I'm keen to tackle it so opening the issue is as much to help me remember as anything!

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

grodin mentioned this issue

Discussion for context/name String parameters #535

Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment