Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Research OpenGov Governance Efficacy #2415

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

adrianhacker-pdx
Copy link

Project Abstract

This project and grant request are in response to an open RFC for researching the OpenGov governance framework on the Polkadot, Kusama, and Substrate blockchains. This project will deliver high quality actionable data about on chain governance in the OpenGov framework versus Governance V1. Another deliverable is qualitative research that will deliver a precise picture of the sentiment and mood within the governance ecosystem. Many more deliverables exist as a part of the formal application.

You will find a very specific application submitted in this pull request that completely outlines the final report subject matter, the data to be collected and the methods of collection and analysis. Specific analytical methods are stated, which include standard and novel data calculations to show, for example, the dimension of disparity and disadvantage within decentralized systems (Gini Coefficient). I have outlined a high-quality project with very specific deliverables that will contain all data and explicit methods used to produce the final results for the purpose of peer review and verification. Furthermore, improvements, roadmaps, and internal feedback systems will be suggested as a starting point for the governance group to consider, allowing an agile implementation of improvements.

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (Polkadot AssetHub (USDC & DOT) address in the application and bank details via email, if applicable).
  • I understand that an agreed upon percentage of each milestone will be paid in vested DOT, to the Polkadot address listed in the application.
  • I am aware that, in order to receive a grant, I (and the entity I represent) have to successfully complete a KYC/KYB check.
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @_______:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

@github-actions github-actions bot added the admin-review This application requires a review from an admin. label Oct 7, 2024
@PieWol PieWol self-assigned this Oct 8, 2024
@PieWol
Copy link
Member

PieWol commented Oct 8, 2024

Hey @adrianhacker-pdx ,

I'm really sorry to inform you that your application efforts have overlapped with our latest changes to this RFP. We decided to close it since other teams previously failed to gain enough support for funding their attempts. Thanks to you I realized that I didn't complete all necessary changes yesterday and the RFP was actually still labeled as "open" in it's own file. As I already mentioned this is sadly not the case anymore. I hope you keep being interested in our Grants Program and we will see another application of yours at some point.

Best wishes.

@PieWol PieWol closed this Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
admin-review This application requires a review from an admin.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants