Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Aviraj] Added maintenance grant ink-boxes #2079

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

avirajkhare00
Copy link
Contributor

Project Abstract

Maintenance grant for ink boxes

GitHub: https://github.com/w3f/Grants-Program/blob/master/applications/ink-boxes.md

Grant level

  • Level 1: Up to $10,000, 2 approvals
  • Level 2: Up to $30,000, 3 approvals
  • Level 3: Unlimited, 5 approvals (for >$100k: Web3 Foundation Council approval)

Application Checklist

  • The application template has been copied and aptly renamed (project_name.md).
  • I have read the application guidelines.
  • Payment details have been provided (bank details via email or Polkadot (USDC & USDT) or BTC address in the application).
  • The software delivered for this grant will be released under an open-source license specified in the application.
  • The initial PR contains only one commit (squash and force-push if needed).
  • The grant will only be announced once the first milestone has been accepted (see the announcement guidelines).
  • I prefer the discussion of this application to take place in a private Element/Matrix channel. My username is: @_______:matrix.org (change the homeserver if you use a different one)

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 31, 2023

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

@avirajkhare00
Copy link
Contributor Author

I have read and hereby sign the Contributor License Agreement.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Noc2 Noc2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the application. I have one initial question: why do you want to update this old repo that doesn't seem to be used by a lot of projects? The smart contracts that are part of this repo are maintained in other repos already, see https://github.com/paritytech/ink-examples So to be honest, I don't see a lot of value in updating it. A Project that is in a much better stage is for example: https://github.com/scio-labs/inkathon

@Noc2 Noc2 added the changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first. label Nov 1, 2023
@takahser takahser self-assigned this Nov 2, 2023
@avirajkhare00
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hey @Noc2 @takahser
Original idea is it like Truffle Boxes make ink-boxes which unfortunately I was unable to accomplish previous time.
I will be taking inkathon as an inspiration. Beautiful UI
My primary goal is that more and more people should come up with ideas and create their boilerplate boxes.

Also, to begin with, you can also suggest some project whose ink box I should create.

@takahser takahser self-requested a review November 3, 2023 13:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@takahser takahser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@avirajkhare00 I have some doubts here as well. I can't justify the value added for maintaining a repo that contains an erc20, erc721 and example flipper contract that is currently not widely used in the community at that price point, especially since the maintenance seem to be limited to improving docs and comments, replying to issues (I don't see any within ~1 year) and fixing bugs (although we don't know what bugs exist). But anyway, the openbrush contracts already features implementations of psp-22 and psp-34 which are very similar and afaik cover the same functionality. I think it's already much more established and widely used by the community, for example, they have group chats on element and discord.

@avirajkhare00
Copy link
Contributor Author

@takahser I really wish to work on this. Should I lower the price of maintainance. I promise I will deliver nice results this time. I have a lot of ideas around the same. Also, I will use inkathon as my base image.

Few people reached out to me on Telegram personally when I was actively working on it.

You are correct, in maintainance grant, scope is only limited to maintain it, but i wish to extend it with new features. Shall I create new grant altogather with lower cost or should I lower my price here. Maybe there is some missing context here.

Copy link
Member

@semuelle semuelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think in order for a project like this to be maintained over a sufficient period of time would require a larger team or community behind it. Since ink boxes doesn't seem to have a community, we currently have projects that accomplish similar results (OpenBrush wizard, Contract wizard), and the first deliveries (1, 2) weren't particularly promising, I would also withhold my vote.

@takahser
Copy link
Collaborator

@avirajkhare00 the W3F Grants Committee decided not to consider this proposal further based on the points that have already been made in this thread. We'd like to thank you for your interest in our program and wish you all the best for the success of your project, in case you decide to pursue it. Also, you're welcome to apply for other grants in the future.

@takahser takahser closed this Nov 10, 2023
@avirajkhare00
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am happy with the decision made my W3F grant committee.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changes requested The team needs to clarify a few things first.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants