Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Oxford comma #132

Open
martinthomson opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #136
Open

Oxford comma #132

martinthomson opened this issue Sep 10, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #136
Labels
editorial editorial suggestion next version we have agreed to look at for the next version - previously 'back burner'

Comments

@martinthomson
Copy link
Contributor

I'm a big fan, but it is clear that this document is not written that way. Or at least not consistently.

I don't know if the following help at all...

image

image
@torgo torgo added statement-review Issues or PRs that have been generated by the call for AC review. editorial editorial suggestion next version we have agreed to look at for the next version - previously 'back burner' and removed statement-review Issues or PRs that have been generated by the call for AC review. labels Sep 11, 2024
@martinthomson martinthomson linked a pull request Sep 11, 2024 that will close this issue
Fix some commas #136
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editorial editorial suggestion next version we have agreed to look at for the next version - previously 'back burner'
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Fix some commas martinthomson/ethical-web-principles
2 participants
@martinthomson @torgo