Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make wording around duplicate tracestate headers more precise #552

Merged

Conversation

basti1302
Copy link
Contributor

@basti1302 basti1302 commented Nov 6, 2023

Participants must not add duplicated tracestate keys, but they are not responsible for cleaning up duplicated tracestate keys that another updstream participant has added.

fixes #548


Preview | Diff

@basti1302 basti1302 added Editorial The reported issue can be addressed with an editorial change. This tag could be combined with others ready-for-review This PR is ready for review to be merged labels Nov 6, 2023
Participants must not add duplicated tracestate keys, but they are not
responsible for cleaning up duplicated tracestate keys that another
updstream participant has added.

fixes w3c#548
@basti1302 basti1302 force-pushed the clarify-handling-of-duplicate-tracestate-keys-548 branch from 662b959 to 7946bf2 Compare November 14, 2023 20:14
@basti1302 basti1302 merged commit 07c7c4f into w3c:main Nov 14, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Editorial The reported issue can be addressed with an editorial change. This tag could be combined with others ready-for-review This PR is ready for review to be merged
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Document handling of tracestate duplicate keys
4 participants