-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Close review loopholes from dropping Proposed Recommendation #927
Conversation
index.bs
Outdated
@@ -4089,6 +4091,14 @@ Transitioning to Recommendation</h4> | |||
[=Advisory Committee representatives=] <em class="rfc2119">may</em> initiate an [=Advisory Committee Appeal=] | |||
of the decision to advance the technical report. | |||
|
|||
The newly published [=Recommendation=] | |||
<em class=rfc2119>must not</em> have any [=substantive changes=] to the document |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
<em class=rfc2119>must not</em> have any [=substantive changes=] to the document | |
<em class=rfc2119>must not</em> include any [=substantive changes=] made to the document |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about just "must not include any substantive changes [ from | compared to ] the [=Candidate Recommendation Snapshot=]"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
that phrasing sounds like it may be permissible to include substantive changes (other than dropping at risk) so long as they haven't been made to the document since CRS. They could, for example, be prepared on the side by the Team in response to AC Review. That wouldn't be appropriate.
How about:
<em class=rfc2119>must not</em> have any [=substantive changes=] to the document | |
<em class=rfc2119>must not</em> make any [=substantive changes=] to the document |
together with
- since the [=Candidate Recommendation Snapshot=]
+ compared to the [=Candidate Recommendation Snapshot=]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This change looks good to me as-is, and I'm ok with the handful of variants suggested edits as well, but leave those to the judgment of the Editor to decide as to what makes the most sense, and fits best in the flow and understanding of the document.
Ensure the Recommendation published after AC Review corresponds to the text submitted to AC Review and the Patent Exlusion Opportunity. See w3c#919
de51d70
to
d3562c0
Compare
Ensure the Recommendation published after AC Review corresponds to the text submitted to AC Review and the Patent Exlusion Opportunity.
See #919
Preview | Diff