-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 130
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Note that “Candidate” means “eligible” for further-advancement consideration #895
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…eration Fixes #402. This change makes “Candidate Recommendation” an accurate term even in the case where a Working Group has indicated they don’t intend to advance to REC.
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement, | ||
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggest taking out the bit about intent.
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement, | |
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets | |
the Working Group believes the document already meets |
requirements for further advancement — but does not indicate that | ||
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement, | ||
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets | ||
the requirements for further advancement. But a [=Candidate Recommendation=] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Refining the phrasing of @nigelmegitt's suggestion, needed another two lines to be selected as suggestion input...
requirements for further advancement — but does not indicate that | |
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement, | |
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets | |
the requirements for further advancement. But a [=Candidate Recommendation=] | |
requirements for further advancement — but does not indicate whether | |
the Working Group believes the document already meets | |
those requirements. Nonetheless, a [=Candidate Recommendation=] |
Fixes #402. This change makes “Candidate Recommendation” an accurate term even in the case where a Working Group has indicated they don’t intend to advance to REC.
Preview | Diff