Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Note that “Candidate” means “eligible” for further-advancement consideration #895

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sideshowbarker
Copy link
Contributor

@sideshowbarker sideshowbarker commented Jun 24, 2024

Fixes #402. This change makes “Candidate Recommendation” an accurate term even in the case where a Working Group has indicated they don’t intend to advance to REC.


Preview | Diff

…eration

Fixes #402. This change makes
“Candidate Recommendation” an accurate term even in the case where a
Working Group has indicated they don’t intend to advance to REC.
Comment on lines +3322 to +3323
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement,
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggest taking out the bit about intent.

Suggested change
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement,
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets
the Working Group believes the document already meets

Comment on lines +3321 to +3324
requirements for further advancement — but does not indicate that
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement,
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets
the requirements for further advancement. But a [=Candidate Recommendation=]
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refining the phrasing of @nigelmegitt's suggestion, needed another two lines to be selected as suggestion input...

Suggested change
requirements for further advancement — but does not indicate that
the Working Group is necessarily <em>intending</em> further advancement,
nor that the Working Group necessarily believes the document already meets
the requirements for further advancement. But a [=Candidate Recommendation=]
requirements for further advancement — but does not indicate whether
the Working Group believes the document already meets
those requirements. Nonetheless, a [=Candidate Recommendation=]

@plehegar plehegar added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label Jun 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

"Candidate Recommendation" is no longer an accurate term
4 participants