Implement Portainer

[samihenrique]

No description provided.

[beeblebrox3]

I don't think the framework should be responsible for this.

[samihenrique]

I see attiv being used most by small and medium, and maybe they don't have a good management of applications and servers, the idea of putting the portainer would be to empower the developer, and ensure greater visibility of what is happening underneath of the cloths in the docker.

[beeblebrox3]

I understand, but why this has to be part of the framework? If one build five apps with the framework, each one needs to have it's own portainer? Or the developer needs to know how to handle this? how to approach this on docs?
I think it will only complicate things. Maybe we can add a section about it on docs, but just that.

[taciomedeiros]

I agree with @beeblebrox3