Consider using the scale-value crate

[gilescope]

The Value type from the desub project has been factored out into it's own crate:

https://github.com/paritytech/scale-value

This may or may not be helpful to you.

[olanod]

Ohhh forking SCALES would have been nicer :(
I'll try it out and perhaps benchmark it to see if it fits our needs, I suppose a parity maintained library will always be more popular. Some features might still be needed like the serializer(JSON -> SCALE), WASM support and need to compare the lightweightness and no_std friendliness to see if it can work with libwallet for hardware wallets.

[gilescope]

The more we can co-operate the better. Sorry I only recently learned about your project. There’s very few people doing cross-many parachain projects at the moment. Actually that’s probably not true, it’s just that I have not found them yet! Will be trying sube out as a backend whenI get a chance.

…

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 18:18, Daniel Olano ***@***.***> wrote: Ohhh forking SCALES <https://github.com/virto-network/scales> would have been nicer :( I'll try it out and perhaps benchmark it to see if it fits our needs, I suppose a parity maintained library will always be more popular. Some features might still be needed like the serializer(JSON -> SCALE), WASM support and need to compare the lightweightness and no_std friendliness to see if it can work with libwallet for hardware wallets. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#15 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGEJCBRIG7WS5MB3OU3GC3VPNOXFANCNFSM5YVEKBQQ> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>