Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why do not use pg access methods for rocksdb #43

Open
rockeet opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 4 comments
Open

Why do not use pg access methods for rocksdb #43

rockeet opened this issue Dec 20, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@rockeet
Copy link

rockeet commented Dec 20, 2021

As I know, access methods is nearer to pg core than FDW, which implies there are less overheads.

Is there any concerns?
@jsc0218
Copy link
Member

jsc0218 commented Dec 20, 2021

We have a PG AM under development, which is not public yet. Stay tuned.

@rockeet
Copy link
Author

rockeet commented Dec 21, 2021

Excellent! We are expecting!

@rockeet
Copy link
Author

rockeet commented Oct 5, 2022

We have a PG AM under development, which is not public yet. Stay tuned.

Is there any progress?

@jsc0218
Copy link
Member

jsc0218 commented Oct 5, 2022

We have a PG AM under development, which is not public yet. Stay tuned.

Is there any progress?

We have one there, maybe add my LinkedIn or email exchange to have a brief chat?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@rockeet @jsc0218