Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): bump no-proxy from 0.3.4 to 0.3.5 #21420

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2024
Merged

Conversation

jdrouet
Copy link
Contributor

@jdrouet jdrouet commented Oct 4, 2024

There has been some updates on cidr-utils used by no-proxy and a security fix on async-graphql (not used by vector, the feature is disabled).

@jdrouet jdrouet requested a review from a team as a code owner October 4, 2024 06:44
@github-actions github-actions bot added the domain: core Anything related to core crates i.e. vector-core, core-common, etc label Oct 4, 2024
@jdrouet jdrouet added the no-changelog Changes in this PR do not need user-facing explanations in the release changelog label Oct 4, 2024
@datadog-vectordotdev
Copy link

Datadog Report

Branch report: jdrouet/update-no-proxy
Commit report: ec5da80
Test service: vector

✅ 0 Failed, 7 Passed, 0 Skipped, 25.48s Total Time

@jszwedko
Copy link
Member

jszwedko commented Oct 4, 2024

Thanks! I think this just needs the license inventory regenerated.

@jszwedko jszwedko added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 990581d5-18de-4256-9bc0-0752dba8d06b Metrics dashboard

Baseline: e7c849f
Comparison: 6be08be

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

Significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
otlp_http_to_blackhole ingress throughput -5.09 [-5.24, -4.94]
socket_to_socket_blackhole ingress throughput -5.60 [-5.67, -5.53]

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
file_to_blackhole egress throughput -8.38 [-14.93, -1.83]

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
datadog_agent_remap_blackhole ingress throughput +1.70 [+1.55, +1.85]
syslog_loki ingress throughput +1.46 [+1.38, +1.55]
datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks ingress throughput +1.25 [+1.13, +1.37]
datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs ingress throughput +0.62 [+0.43, +0.81]
http_to_http_acks ingress throughput +0.57 [-0.65, +1.80]
http_to_s3 ingress throughput +0.28 [+0.00, +0.56]
datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks ingress throughput +0.26 [+0.10, +0.43]
http_to_http_noack ingress throughput +0.20 [+0.11, +0.29]
http_to_http_json ingress throughput +0.05 [-0.00, +0.10]
syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics ingress throughput +0.03 [-0.10, +0.16]
splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.07, +0.10]
splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.08, +0.10]
splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.11, +0.11]
syslog_splunk_hec_logs ingress throughput -0.69 [-0.79, -0.60]
otlp_grpc_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.82 [-0.93, -0.70]
splunk_hec_route_s3 ingress throughput -0.93 [-1.26, -0.60]
http_elasticsearch ingress throughput -0.98 [-1.16, -0.79]
syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics ingress throughput -1.06 [-1.24, -0.88]
syslog_humio_logs ingress throughput -1.70 [-1.87, -1.53]
fluent_elasticsearch ingress throughput -1.85 [-2.35, -1.36]
syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole ingress throughput -2.01 [-2.11, -1.91]
http_text_to_http_json ingress throughput -2.99 [-3.14, -2.84]
syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics ingress throughput -3.99 [-4.15, -3.83]
otlp_http_to_blackhole ingress throughput -5.09 [-5.24, -4.94]
socket_to_socket_blackhole ingress throughput -5.60 [-5.67, -5.53]
file_to_blackhole egress throughput -8.38 [-14.93, -1.83]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Oct 10, 2024
@jszwedko jszwedko added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2024
Copy link

Regression Detector Results

Run ID: 322ef6c4-174c-4c9f-a20e-db2e0389ca0f Metrics dashboard

Baseline: a0f2e53
Comparison: bda0ce4

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

No significant changes in experiment optimization goals

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.

Experiments ignored for regressions

Regressions in experiments with settings containing erratic: true are ignored.

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
file_to_blackhole egress throughput -12.48 [-19.06, -5.90]

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI links
otlp_http_to_blackhole ingress throughput +2.35 [+2.23, +2.46]
http_to_http_acks ingress throughput +1.68 [+0.44, +2.91]
syslog_regex_logs2metric_ddmetrics ingress throughput +1.47 [+1.27, +1.66]
syslog_humio_logs ingress throughput +1.22 [+1.11, +1.33]
http_elasticsearch ingress throughput +1.21 [+1.01, +1.40]
otlp_grpc_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.79 [+0.68, +0.91]
syslog_log2metric_splunk_hec_metrics ingress throughput +0.54 [+0.42, +0.66]
splunk_hec_route_s3 ingress throughput +0.42 [+0.10, +0.73]
http_to_http_noack ingress throughput +0.14 [+0.06, +0.21]
datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs ingress throughput +0.07 [-0.10, +0.24]
http_to_http_json ingress throughput +0.04 [-0.01, +0.08]
splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_noack ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.08, +0.10]
splunk_hec_indexer_ack_blackhole ingress throughput +0.01 [-0.07, +0.09]
splunk_hec_to_splunk_hec_logs_acks ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.11, +0.11]
socket_to_socket_blackhole ingress throughput -0.36 [-0.43, -0.29]
http_to_s3 ingress throughput -0.44 [-0.71, -0.16]
datadog_agent_remap_blackhole ingress throughput -0.51 [-0.61, -0.41]
fluent_elasticsearch ingress throughput -0.66 [-1.15, -0.17]
syslog_log2metric_humio_metrics ingress throughput -0.70 [-0.77, -0.62]
datadog_agent_remap_blackhole_acks ingress throughput -0.73 [-0.84, -0.62]
datadog_agent_remap_datadog_logs_acks ingress throughput -0.97 [-1.16, -0.79]
syslog_log2metric_tag_cardinality_limit_blackhole ingress throughput -1.43 [-1.52, -1.35]
syslog_loki ingress throughput -1.55 [-1.65, -1.45]
syslog_splunk_hec_logs ingress throughput -2.16 [-2.25, -2.07]
http_text_to_http_json ingress throughput -3.81 [-3.95, -3.66]
file_to_blackhole egress throughput -12.48 [-19.06, -5.90]

Explanation

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

Merged via the queue into master with commit bda0ce4 Oct 11, 2024
50 checks passed
@jszwedko jszwedko deleted the jdrouet/update-no-proxy branch October 11, 2024 06:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
domain: core Anything related to core crates i.e. vector-core, core-common, etc no-changelog Changes in this PR do not need user-facing explanations in the release changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants