-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ability to isolate a layer #2097
Comments
note: I discovered the filter feature after writing this down. this is an acceptable workaround, although more difficult to discover |
@Aurelie-Jallut where could we add a "show/hide all" button ? :) |
Would work for sure! Is there a way not to consume vertical space you think ? :) |
Hello everyone, I have the same problem. I am currently working on a map project ‘Braunschweiger Jacobsweg’ with a large number of POI, churches, stamp points, catering facilities, public transport stops etc. My idea is to add another selection option in the form of small square windows. (The ‘eyes´ control the visibility, the boxes control the selection, for example for data export. This would give us a quick way of editing. Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) |
je suis désolé ! je suis désolé ! Excuse me, |
Correction |
Hello everyone, Bonjour à tous ! Traduit avec www.DeepL.com/Translator (version gratuite) Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) |
This is a good point. I forgot to mention that one of the motivation to isolate elements on the map is to export after. I agree with you that the export should probably allow for a WYSIWYG where hidden elements do not export. |
The export should be WYSIWYG, and if not it's a bug. To export only one layer, one can edit it and click on "download" on "advanced actions". We may add a "download" icon within the quick action (close to the magnifying glass, eye…) to make it simpler, but this toolbox is not extensive to infinite… |
Hello Yohan, Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version) |
Hello, |
fix #2097 cf #1500 ![image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2c8b96e4-8cf7-4d5f-afed-11adf73e98a8) This is an alternative proposal for #2097: - adding the button near the "Filter" toggle was a bit ugly, CSS/HTML talking, because this "Filters" box is a details/summary - I thought that other needs could live in the same place: a link to download the filtered/visible data, and a button to show the map data extent The "toggle all" button works this way: - if one or more layers are shown, it will hide those layers - otherwise it will show all layers I've preferred not to change the button icon according to map state, because I didn't find a reliable way to do so, thus I'm afraid to have inconsistency, but I can't try harder if needed. Related: I'm thinking of adding a "Download" button for each layers, as it's a request that comes quite often. @Aurelie-Jallut could you have a look ? :)
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I have a map where I collect many GPX files uploaded from various sources. After a few years, I ended up with over 100 layers. I would like to be able to quickly isolate a layer for inspection, download etc.
Describe the solution you'd like
A series of contextual commands that let me manage the visibility of multiple layers at a time would get ideal:
minimally, 2 commands that let me hide or show all layers would work:
(then I can unhide the layer of my choice)
Describe alternatives you've considered
another approach could be to have a command entitled:
Additional context
Here is the type of map that I use where I would find this feature useful:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: