Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Incorporate propagation modeling for more accurate regional travel times #66

Open
liamtoney opened this issue Mar 4, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@liamtoney
Copy link
Member

Currently, for regional applications of rtm (projected=False), only time_method='celerity' is supported — we assume a homogeneous wavespeed.

This can result is gross errors in travel time estimation for realistic atmospheres due to different infrasound phases as a function of range, as well as spatially (and temporally) heterogeneous atmospheric state.

We could compute more realistic travel times using e.g. InfraGA ray tracing, and store these in a lookup table. We could take the average vertical profile over the region defined by the source search grid + the station locations. The lookup table would not be valid through time, of course.

Users could supply their own atmospheric specification files, and/or [preferred!] we could use e.g. the ECMWF Python API to download relevant files for the user-specified spatial configuration and starttime, endtime, etc. automagically.

Ping @fkdannemann

@liamtoney liamtoney added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 4, 2022
@fkdannemann
Copy link

If you are still interested in this, we can discuss a collaboration/feature enhancement starting next Oct(ish). Writing my funding proposal for next FY and this came up as a possibility.

@davidfee5
Copy link
Member

Thanks Fransiska. I know we are still interested in this but probably have too many other things going on right now! Let's chat about it soon though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants