You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One vote for gamma (CLVD) and delta (ISO) because these are typically used in the literature.
Also one vote for dip input in degrees because the output is in degrees, same as strike and rake, and seems easier to relate input to output when testing inversions. (though we know that internally we convert to h).
What should be on the output plots?: v and w , or gamma and delta.
Same with dip. The input is term of 0<h<1 but output is in dip(degrees)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: