You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If there were sha512 checksums for the files provided at URLs like the one below, users would have more confidence in the process, and the RVM tool would stop complaining
"No checksum for downloaded archive, recording checksum in user configuration."
Even diligent users who then go find the file ~/rvm/usre/sha512 have nothing to compare it with at the source site: http://rubies.travis-ci.org/ubuntu/12.04/x86_64/ruby-2.2.4
PS - Thanks for all this! I first heard of RVM an hour ago, and now I'm running a current version and the gem that I was looking for on my Ubuntu 12.04 system (only has Ruby 1.8 or 1.9.1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If there were sha512 checksums for the files provided at URLs like the one below, users would have more confidence in the process, and the RVM tool would stop complaining
"No checksum for downloaded archive, recording checksum in user configuration."
Even diligent users who then go find the file ~/rvm/usre/sha512 have nothing to compare it with at the source site:
http://rubies.travis-ci.org/ubuntu/12.04/x86_64/ruby-2.2.4
PS - Thanks for all this! I first heard of RVM an hour ago, and now I'm running a current version and the gem that I was looking for on my Ubuntu 12.04 system (only has Ruby 1.8 or 1.9.1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: