You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This test, however, does not work if the boundary values are UFL expressions for instance (as in the case of tides with a time-dependent ramp up). We should find a better way of imposing the boundaries.
Why the 0.0 is a special case here? If we need to manually turn off the bedload term at certain boundaries I think we could add a special boundary flag to handle it. Maybe @mc4117 has some ideas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
At the moment the ExnerBedloadTerm checks whether zeros have been prescribed at the boundary to decide whether to include the boundary term or not:
thetis/thetis/exner_eq.py
Lines 115 to 127 in 8685cd9
This test, however, does not work if the boundary values are UFL expressions for instance (as in the case of tides with a time-dependent ramp up). We should find a better way of imposing the boundaries.
Why the 0.0 is a special case here? If we need to manually turn off the bedload term at certain boundaries I think we could add a special boundary flag to handle it. Maybe @mc4117 has some ideas.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: