Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Noticeable CPU load on low-power Pi #249

Open
floe opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Noticeable CPU load on low-power Pi #249

floe opened this issue Mar 19, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@floe
Copy link

floe commented Mar 19, 2024

Describe the bug
I'm running Theengs Gateway on a Raspberry Pi Zero, and getting pretty consistent CPU load of ~ 35%.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Install TG in a venv on a Raspberry Pi Zero.
  2. Run it, observe CPU usage.

Expected behavior
Way less CPU load (IMHO). From looking at the log, it's blasting out somewhere around 100 MQTT messages per second, and I only have one single plant sensor at the moment.

Environment

# Theengs Gateway Diagnostics

## Package Versions

| Name               | Value  |
|--------------------|--------|
| Theengs Gateway    | 1.4.0  |
| Theengs Decoder    | 1.7.2  |
| Bleak              | 0.21.1 |
| Bluetooth Clocks   | 0.2.0  |
| Bluetooth Numbers  | 1.1.1  |
| Paho MQTT          | 2.0.0  |
| Bluetooth Adapters | 0.18.0 |

## Python

| Name           | Value                          |
|----------------|--------------------------------|
| Version        | 3.11.2                         |
| Implementation | CPython                        |
| Compiler       | GCC 12.2.0                     |
| Executable     | /home/floe/theengs/bin/python3 |

## Operating System

| Name         | Value                                    |
|--------------|------------------------------------------|
| System       | Linux                                    |
| Release      | 6.6.20+rpt-rpi-v6                        |
| Version      | #1 Raspbian 1:6.6.20-1+rpt1 (2024-03-07) |
| Machine type | armv6l                                   |
| Distribution | Raspbian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm)         |

## Configuration

File: /home/floe/theengsgw.conf

{
    "adapter": "",
    "bindkeys": {},
    "ble": 1,
    "ble_scan_time": 5,
    "ble_time_between_scans": 5,
    "discovery": 1,
    "discovery_device_name": "TheengsGateway",
    "discovery_filter": [
        "IBEACON"
    ],
    "discovery_topic": "homeassistant",
    "enable_tls": 0,
    "enable_websocket": 0,
    "general_presence": 0,
    "hass_discovery": 1,
    "host": "jarvis.lan",
    "identities": {},
    "log_level": "INFO",
    "lwt_topic": "home/TheengsGateway/LWT",
    "pass": "***",
    "port": 1883,
    "presence": 0,
    "presence_topic": "home/TheengsGateway/presence",
    "publish_advdata": 0,
    "publish_all": 1,
    "publish_topic": "home/TheengsGateway/BTtoMQTT",
    "scanning_mode": "active",
    "subscribe_topic": "home/+/BTtoMQTT/undecoded",
    "time_format": 0,
    "time_sync": [],
    "tracker_timeout": 120,
    "user": "***"
}

## Bluetooth adapters

Default adapter: hci0

### hci0

| Name         | Value                   |
|--------------|-------------------------|
| address      | B8:27:EB:XX:XX:XX       |
| sw_version   | fjordcam                |
| hw_version   | usb:v1D6Bp0246d0542     |
| passive_scan | False                   |
| manufacturer | Raspberry Pi Foundation |
| product      | None                    |
| vendor_id    | None                    |
| product_id   | None                    |

Additional context
I assume that there is some config file or commandline switch I could use to slow it down - are the -sd and -tb options related to that?

@floe
Copy link
Author

floe commented Mar 19, 2024

Additional note: I tried with -pa 0 -tb 10 -sd 2 and that has definitely cut down the number of MQTT messages being sent, but doesn't seem to have had any noticeable impact on CPU load.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant