You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As far as I can tell, the SimplePlannerLVSNoIKPlanProfile is now the same as the SimplePlannerLVSPlanProfile version. The "no IK" piece seems to be handled by checking whether the Cartesian waypoint has a seed state associated with it. If it does, then that seed state is used as the joint state with which to interpolate (i.e., "no IK"); if not, IK is performed to get the associated joint state. If this is in fact the case, we should remove the SimplePlannerLVSNoIKPlanProfile class to eliminate confusion
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As far as I can tell, the
SimplePlannerLVSNoIKPlanProfile
is now the same as theSimplePlannerLVSPlanProfile
version. The "no IK" piece seems to be handled by checking whether the Cartesian waypoint has a seed state associated with it. If it does, then that seed state is used as the joint state with which to interpolate (i.e., "no IK"); if not, IK is performed to get the associated joint state. If this is in fact the case, we should remove theSimplePlannerLVSNoIKPlanProfile
class to eliminate confusionThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: