layout | title |
---|---|
course |
Learning Outcomes |
Writing down a short list of high-level goals gives me a focus for every aspect of the course:
Course outline (advertising the course to prospective students)
Bloom's cognitive levels
- Above principles all from this category
Process skills/Program outcomes
- Presenting arguments typical to the field
- Critically assessing within genres typical to the field
- Reading diagrams typical to the field
- Team work
- Use of instruments, tools, or methods typical to the field
- Applying key principles across a range of domains
Values
- Some of the most heartfelt yet also most difficult to incorporate
- In a content-based course (and discipline!) these tend to be pushed into subtext
- I write these in terms of choices I want the students to consider
Cognitive outcome:
Make appropriate tradeoffs of consistency versus availability for different features in a design.
Level: Create
Level: Create
Process skill:
Reading diagrams typical to the field
Presentations organized around a consistency-availability diagram:
Assignments 5 and 6 asked students to design systems using these tradeoffs
Final exam
- Review used a modified form of the diagram
- Exam asked them to locate different assignments on the same diagram
{% comment %}
Bloom's taxonomy of cognitive outcomes
- Original---1959
- More recent---2002, more flexible
- Recall, Understand, Apply, Analyze, Evaluate, Create
Biggs's SOLO
- Prestructural
- Unistructural
- Multistructural
- Relational
- Extended abstract
ICE
- Ideas
- Connections
- Extensions
{% endcomment %}