Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should we have a separate "source" SBOM and "build" SBOM #131

Open
goneall opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Should we have a separate "source" SBOM and "build" SBOM #131

goneall opened this issue Sep 12, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@goneall
Copy link
Member

goneall commented Sep 12, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Based on the Open SSF SBOM Naming recommendations (draft at this point), there should be separate SBOM's for the binary artifacts and the source artifacts.

We currently include the source information and the build information in the same SBOM as the source.

One thought is to have 3 SBOM - consolidated, source only, build only.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@goneall