Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

FLOPs can not reveal real latency of model, but MACs can? #70

Open
lucasjinreal opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 3 comments
Open

FLOPs can not reveal real latency of model, but MACs can? #70

lucasjinreal opened this issue Jun 11, 2021 · 3 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@lucasjinreal
Copy link

from the last table only saw MACs and params, is that FLOPs doesn't needed a record? While some paper still report their FLOPs/G for comparasion.
@rongzhao-zhang
Copy link

Either FLOPs or MACs are all theoretical things. The real latency is also highly dependent on the hardware structures/drivers, etc., which is extremely hard to predict in practice.

@sovrasov sovrasov added the question Further information is requested label Jun 13, 2021
@lucasjinreal
Copy link
Author

Oh, I mean why not also add a FLOPs in column in common used model in README table.

@sovrasov
Copy link
Owner

@jinfagang see #16

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@sovrasov @lucasjinreal @rongzhao-zhang