Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOC Document using GridField with arbitrary data #409

Conversation

GuySartorelli
Copy link
Member

Copy link
Member Author

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Note: The branch this PR is targetting now has a CI action. This PR will need to be force-pushed to run the CI, and the CI must be green before merging.

@GuySartorelli
Copy link
Member Author

Rebased and resolved conflicts, lint passes locally.

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli force-pushed the pulls/5/arbitrary-gridfield-data branch 2 times, most recently from 87019cf to 9f237d6 Compare December 10, 2023 23:47
Copy link
Contributor

@maxime-rainville maxime-rainville left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left some extra comments not overly fuss about any of them.

@GuySartorelli GuySartorelli force-pushed the pulls/5/arbitrary-gridfield-data branch 2 times, most recently from 306d5bd to deb7f1b Compare December 19, 2023 22:37
Copy link
Contributor

@maxime-rainville maxime-rainville left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Me happy

@maxime-rainville maxime-rainville merged commit 7cf3a9b into silverstripe:5 Dec 21, 2023
3 checks passed
@maxime-rainville maxime-rainville deleted the pulls/5/arbitrary-gridfield-data branch December 21, 2023 04:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants