We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The parameter we have been calling 'equil_torsion_angle' is actually the phase offset of periodic torsions. http://docs.openmm.org/development/api-python/generated/simtk.openmm.openmm.PeriodicTorsionForce.html
It seems misleading to keep that variable name, so we should rename it something else like 'torsion_phase_offset'.
This is why we were seeing a torsion peak at 180-equil_torsion_angle for periodicity=1. (see shirtsgroup/analyze_foldamers#12)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, go ahead and make the change (just make sure that examples are updated as well).
Sorry, something went wrong.
Ok I changed this here: #102
No branches or pull requests
The parameter we have been calling 'equil_torsion_angle' is actually the phase offset of periodic torsions. http://docs.openmm.org/development/api-python/generated/simtk.openmm.openmm.PeriodicTorsionForce.html
It seems misleading to keep that variable name, so we should rename it something else like 'torsion_phase_offset'.
This is why we were seeing a torsion peak at 180-equil_torsion_angle for periodicity=1. (see shirtsgroup/analyze_foldamers#12)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: