You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The lack of comprehensive event emissions in critical functions will cause a low impact on the protocol's transparency as certain state changes and operations are not logged, hindering effective monitoring and auditing.
Root Cause
In SolidlyV2AMO.sol, while the contract emits events for major operations like adding liquidity and removing liquidity, not all critical state changes and function executions have corresponding detailed event emissions. For example, the setParams function emits a ParamsSet event but does not capture all parameter changes or internal state modifications comprehensively.
1-Critical functions are executed that modify key state variables without emitting detailed events.
2-Internal state changes within functions do not trigger additional event emissions.
External pre-conditions
1-External monitoring tools rely on event emissions to track contract activities.
2-Users and auditors depend on comprehensive event logs to verify the correctness and security of contract operations.
Attack Path
1-The protocol performs critical operations that modify state variables without emitting detailed events.
2-An observer or auditor attempts to monitor contract activities by tracking events.
3-Due to incomplete event emissions, certain state changes and operations go unlogged.
4-This lack of transparency makes it difficult to verify the integrity of contract operations and detect potential anomalies or unauthorized actions.
Impact
The protocol experiences a low risk of reduced transparency and auditing capabilities, making it harder to monitor contract operations effectively and conduct thorough audits, potentially leading to undetected issues or unauthorized activities.
PoC
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity 0.8.19;
import "./SolidlyV2AMO.sol";
contract MonitoringContract {
SolidlyV2AMO amo;
constructor(address amoAddress) {
amo = SolidlyV2AMO(amoAddress);
}
function monitorSetParams() public view returns (bool) {
// Attempt to monitor parameter changes via events
// Notice that only ParamsSet is emitted without detailed parameter breakdown
// Internal state changes are not captured
return true;
}
}
Mitigation
1-Emit Detailed Events in All Critical Functions: Ensure that every function modifying significant state variables or performing critical operations emits events capturing all relevant parameters and outcomes.
2-Standardize Event Logging: Adopt a consistent event naming and parameter logging strategy across all functions to ensure uniformity and ease of monitoring.
3-Include Contextual Information: Add additional contextual data to events, such as transaction origin, affected addresses, or previous state values, to provide a more comprehensive audit trail.
4-Regular Code Reviews: Periodically review the contract’s codebase to ensure all critical operations are adequately logged with appropriate event emissions.
5-Leverage OpenZeppelin's Event Libraries: Utilize established libraries or patterns for event emissions to ensure best practices and reduce the likelihood of omissions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Summary
The lack of comprehensive event emissions in critical functions will cause a low impact on the protocol's transparency as certain state changes and operations are not logged, hindering effective monitoring and auditing.
Root Cause
In SolidlyV2AMO.sol, while the contract emits events for major operations like adding liquidity and removing liquidity, not all critical state changes and function executions have corresponding detailed event emissions. For example, the setParams function emits a ParamsSet event but does not capture all parameter changes or internal state modifications comprehensively.
Relevant Code Snippet:
Internal pre-conditions
1-Critical functions are executed that modify key state variables without emitting detailed events.
2-Internal state changes within functions do not trigger additional event emissions.
External pre-conditions
1-External monitoring tools rely on event emissions to track contract activities.
2-Users and auditors depend on comprehensive event logs to verify the correctness and security of contract operations.
Attack Path
1-The protocol performs critical operations that modify state variables without emitting detailed events.
2-An observer or auditor attempts to monitor contract activities by tracking events.
3-Due to incomplete event emissions, certain state changes and operations go unlogged.
4-This lack of transparency makes it difficult to verify the integrity of contract operations and detect potential anomalies or unauthorized actions.
Impact
The protocol experiences a low risk of reduced transparency and auditing capabilities, making it harder to monitor contract operations effectively and conduct thorough audits, potentially leading to undetected issues or unauthorized activities.
PoC
Mitigation
1-Emit Detailed Events in All Critical Functions:
Ensure that every function modifying significant state variables or performing critical operations emits events capturing all relevant parameters and outcomes.
2-Standardize Event Logging:
Adopt a consistent event naming and parameter logging strategy across all functions to ensure uniformity and ease of monitoring.
3-Include Contextual Information:
Add additional contextual data to events, such as transaction origin, affected addresses, or previous state values, to provide a more comprehensive audit trail.
4-Regular Code Reviews:
Periodically review the contract’s codebase to ensure all critical operations are adequately logged with appropriate event emissions.
5-Leverage OpenZeppelin's Event Libraries:
Utilize established libraries or patterns for event emissions to ensure best practices and reduce the likelihood of omissions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: