-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
Unit tests for Core_IWorkerVia #47
Comments
I agree. That's been the plan but as you can tell, I have limited time to After I added the Workers functionality, the otherwise simple daemon
Had I started writing this library today I certainly would've included test On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 7:57 AM, Benjamin Runnels
|
From first glance looks like I can re-use a lot of the code from Core_Lock_Memcached |
Ohh, don't want to use memcached but memcache. Will see what I can work out. |
Any reason why? In my experience with this Memcached was more reliable than Memcache -- I've moved to redis some time ago for most of my work so this may have Shane On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Benjamin Runnels
|
I have memcache installed already. lol |
well for the most part they should be drop-in replacements. in prod, unless things have changed since I last investigated this, I'd On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Benjamin Runnels
|
I would like to start work on adding a Core_Worker_Via_Memcache class. It would make it much simpler to implement this new class if there were some unit tests to run to ensure the results from each method call are behaving as intended.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: