Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[CNN]호이호이호이 84% #42

Open
lini1634 opened this issue Jun 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

[CNN]호이호이호이 84% #42

lini1634 opened this issue Jun 12, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@lini1634
Copy link

-기존 데이터 vgg16
image

-장미 바꾼 데이터 vgg16
image

-새로운 데이터 vgg16
image

*resnet32는 정확도가 전부 다 vgg16보다 떨어짐.(제일 높을때가 61%)

=>세미가 뽑은 클래스별 정확도
image

-메밀꽃 코스모스 벚꽃 제외한 7개 데이터 vgg16
image

@unizard
Copy link

unizard commented Jun 12, 2019

@lini1634 3개의 데이터는 너무 안나와서 뺀?

그리고 Resnet32 랑 VGG16은 원래 예상이 되던 수치랍니다.
image

https://github.com/jcjohnson/cnn-benchmarks

@lini1634
Copy link
Author

lini1634 commented Jun 12, 2019

@unizard 표에서 에러율로 보면 resnet34가 vgg16보다 쪼금 더 좋은데 정확도는 같은조건에서 각각 61% 74%여서요 ㅜㅜ 속도는 확실히 resnet34이 훨씬 빠르긴 했어요 !! 꽃3개 뺀 이유 분석부터 하겠습니당 !

@PMH2906 PMH2906 changed the title 호이호이호이 84% [CNN]호이호이호이 84% Jun 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants