Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support biblatex standard entry type #143

Closed
rudrab opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Support biblatex standard entry type #143

rudrab opened this issue Sep 20, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@rudrab
Copy link

rudrab commented Sep 20, 2016

Hi,
while its working well for bibtex, it can't parse biblatex's entry (e.g. @online).
Do you have any plan to add biblatex's features?
This is possibly same as #105 . So, in this case, do you have any idea when 0.8 is going to release?

@lfdversluis
Copy link

I support this feature. I was surprised to find out just now @online are silently (!) ignored.

@omangin
Copy link
Collaborator

omangin commented Feb 10, 2018

Hi @rudrab. Thank you for that.

Non-standard bibtex entries are indeed ignored by default. You can change the behavior through the ignore_nonstandard_types argument. However the choice of this default can be discussed here…

I am surprised that it does so silently for you. I just tested it and get a python warning. What version of python and bibtexparser are you using?

Finally, we should probably at least include these as standard or have two sets of standard entry types for bibtex and biblatex.

@omangin omangin changed the title biblatex entry type Support biblatex standard entry type Feb 10, 2018
@omangin omangin removed the bug label Feb 10, 2018
@omangin omangin mentioned this issue Feb 10, 2018
@MiWeiss
Copy link
Collaborator

MiWeiss commented Aug 17, 2022

Warning is raised, allowing to change configuration.

Changing the defaults would only be possible with V2, as quite a high impact change

@MiWeiss MiWeiss closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Aug 17, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants