-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 49
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Option to run more in the SDist step? #837
Comments
Hmm, wouldn't But then, what scenario do you have in mind for this one? For header-only I think it would still be good to make a no-arch wheel, but it would depend heavily on #831 idea. My view on this is that the headers can be generated or shipped with specific macros in the |
I'm thinking of pybind11 and nanobind, specifically, which ship a It might be nice if those could produce an SDist that would be able to make a wheel without needing CMake. But both currently require CMake for the wheel, and both produce pure wheels so most users won't care about the SDist, so it's pretty minor. |
Ah, I guess you are making
Well, it seems like About the sdist vs wheel, I was considering how would the user be using it. Let's say they have
Wouldn't |
See #766, it would be nice if we could have header only packages just build for the SDist step. Might require an option to run cmake install in the SDist step.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: