Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GPL-608 Q. Do we have for all plates in *this* box all the plate map information for all samples? #98

Open
2 tasks
rl15 opened this issue Aug 6, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@rl15
Copy link

rl15 commented Aug 6, 2020

User story
GPL-608 | As heron stakeholders (Rich C, Danni, Sonia, John S) I woudl like for a box to know all plates have complet plate maps to having to revist a box only some plate have plate maps

Who are the primary contacts for this story
Rich C
Danni W

Preamble

What we expected:
A LH lab would send to SFTP plate maps (in night) for plates shipping to Sanger the next day.
On the next day we would receive box and box manifest.
SSR pick all the positives from a given box with this information.

What we observe:
When we don't have plate map information for all the plates in a box, the LH +ves on site report suggests that these plates have only -ves, and we dont pick from them.
LH lab updates SFTP with plate map information
SM see that picked from boxes suddenly have new positives we can pick
Logistics become difficult as we were expecting to pick all the +ves from a box on a day, not over several days.

Root issue: If for a given box on a given day we have plate maps for some of the plates, but not all, and SM start picking from the box.

Options

  1. Have a new report that show for a given box all plates have complete plate map information. (Complete plate map information = root sample id, RNA plate barcode , result, result date.
  2. Add to existing LH positive on site report new column ' All my sibling samples are in a plate that has a all the plate map information for our box'
  3. List the +ves on site report by box barcode, show which have plate maps or not.
  4. Something more elegant.

Acceptance criteria
To be considered successful the solution must allow:

  • TBD
  • ...

Dependencies
This story is blocked by the following dependencies:

  • #<issue_no.>
  • sanger/#<issue_no.>

Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.

@rl15 rl15 added Enhancement New feature or request Sentinel Cherry Picking research and removed Enhancement New feature or request labels Aug 6, 2020
@rl15
Copy link
Author

rl15 commented Oct 20, 2020

Discussed with Rich C & James M on 20th October agreed to deprecate/archive low value given lens of Beckman robotics

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant