From 46e1b779dad7f76878f0ca9b3d9058385e2b33e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sancho McCann Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2023 13:15:54 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] Update consent-reversal.html.pm --- consent-reversal.html.pm | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/consent-reversal.html.pm b/consent-reversal.html.pm index ba69606..2ee1751 100644 --- a/consent-reversal.html.pm +++ b/consent-reversal.html.pm @@ -293,9 +293,3 @@ that is appropriate in the circumstances of each case." It cannot be that litigants and judges are free to ignore this reasoning just because the ultimate judgment was set aside by a s. 70 consent reversal. - -In my view, the reasons of a Court of Appeal judgment that has been -reversed on consent should continue to be considered binding precedent -through the ordinary principles of vertical ◊em{stare decisis}, unless -the Supreme Court of Canada expressly or implicitly disavows the -reasoning.