-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove development timeline view from project page #175
Comments
Maybe the timeline should only be shown for requirements in categories that have been linked to GitHub. Otherwise, they just add to the visual complexity of a component view. |
I was thinking the same thing, but came up with the idea that users could change the state manually (#166). |
On the other hand, it nudges people to really link issues to requirements. But still, the disadvantages of the UI cluttered with (empty) timelines are overwhelming. |
Do you have an example link to a requirement with "See on GitHub" button? I am wondering that it is so prominently placed on the top right. Should be rather somewhere close to the Development Timeline. |
https://beta.requirements-bazaar.org/projects/110/categories/317 (the layout to the top right is not yet deployed on beta. It looked even worse before). |
Oh, that does not look great. 😅 Maybe instead of the button there can be something like an underlined, subtle link below "Development Timeline". |
Sounds like a good idea. I think some of this information and the actions can be better visualized on the detail page for a single requirement. With #170 I started including this detail page more in the overall concept of the website anyway. |
Yes. An initial GitHub button could also be hidden in the ... menu. |
The timeline component seems to be very useful for tracking development progress on a single requirement. However, on the project level, the current semantic of the timeline do not seem to be useful at all.
The same information can be observed by users by just using the "Show on GitHub" button and look at the more development related information there.
Instead of the timeline, we could:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: