Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix number order in the 2.2 section. #31

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Fix number order in the 2.2 section. #31

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

jobot0
Copy link

@jobot0 jobot0 commented Sep 18, 2017

Hey thanks for this amazing guide! The 2.2.2 has been skipped.

Hey thanks for this amazing guide! The 2.2.2 has been skipped.
Copy link

@jemmaSlater jemmaSlater left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello! There were some numbers missing in this section, not sure how that happened - thanks for fixing it and opening a pull request.

There are just a couple now which are out of place still which I have identified below, if you wouldn't mind adjusting them I will merge it. Thanks!

@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ There are two __exceptions__ where it is possible to have lines longer than 100:
* Lines that are not possible to split, e.g. long URLs in comments.
* `package` and `import` statements.

#### 2.2.15.1 Line-wrapping strategies
#### 2.2.14.1 Line-wrapping strategies

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should now be 2.2.13.1

@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ loadPicture(context,
"Title of the picture");
```

### 2.2.16 RxJava chains styling
### 2.2.15 RxJava chains styling

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And this should be 2.2.14

ed-george added a commit to ed-george/android-guidelines that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2019
Fixes ribot#31 - number issues within 2.2.x
@ed-george ed-george mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants