Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nm-vpn reports vnet0 as a connected vpn #51

Open
cjohnston1158 opened this issue May 9, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

nm-vpn reports vnet0 as a connected vpn #51

cjohnston1158 opened this issue May 9, 2020 · 7 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@cjohnston1158
Copy link
Contributor

When running VMs on my laptop nv-vpn reports as being connected to vnet0 which seems odd.

LC_ALL=C nmcli -t connection show --active
:72b1520d-923c-47f9-9443-59c2d1829c13:802-11-wireless:wlp59s0
virbr0:aefcd86c-6a1a-4b89-b889-42b4fe3ca9f4:bridge:virbr0
vnet0:fa8b1a4f-91de-4a14-9c05-71d4c0233066:tun:vnet0

apt-cache policy i3xrocks-nm-vpn
i3xrocks-nm-vpn:
Installed: 3.0.18-1
Candidate: 3.0.18-1
Version table:
*** 3.0.18-1 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/regolith-linux/stable/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages

@kgilmer
Copy link
Member

kgilmer commented May 12, 2020

There were some recent changes to the vpn block that are being published to the release PPA today Chris. Can you verify after update if the issue still exists?

@kgilmer kgilmer added the bug Something isn't working label May 12, 2020
@cjohnston1158
Copy link
Contributor Author

This does appear fixed in the latest release. Thanks Ken!

@cjohnston1158
Copy link
Contributor Author

@kgilmer I think I spoke too soon.. It now shows vnet1

pt-cache policy i3xrocks-nm-vpn
i3xrocks-nm-vpn:
Installed: 3.0.21-1
Candidate: 3.0.21-1
Version table:
*** 3.0.21-1 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/regolith-linux/stable/ubuntu focal/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

@cjohnston1158 cjohnston1158 reopened this May 13, 2020
@cjohnston1158
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm still seeing this with 3.2.1-1

@kgilmer
Copy link
Member

kgilmer commented Oct 2, 2020

Hi @cjohnston1158 , I do not use this type of VPN so am unsure of what the expected behavior is. Are you expecting to see wlp59s0 or something else?

@cjohnston1158
Copy link
Contributor Author

It's not actually a vpn but a bridge.

@moritzheiber
Copy link
Contributor

I'm returning to this ticket because, judging from the output, the script does exactly what it's supposed to do. The VM is creating a tun device (vnet0) which NetworkManager correctly identifies and manages.

You later said that vnet1 was being shown. Is that still the case? And is it really a device of type bridge? Following the logic of the virtual network interfaces it should also be a tun device.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants