You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
const noop = createAction('NOOP');
const error = new TypeError('not a number');
expect(noop(error)).to.deep.equal({
type: 'NOOP',
payload: error,
error: true
});
I noticed that when I pass an error for testing, like this:
const {
successAction,
errorAction
} = createActions({
SUCCEESS_ACTION: payload => ({
data: payload
}),
ERROR_ACTION: payload => ({
error: payload
}),
});
try {
let data;
// ... some stuff to fetch data :)
throw Error('Bad times on the internetz');
successAction(data);
} catch (error) {
errorAction(error):
}
The action is now:
{
type: 'ERROR_ACTION',
payload: {}, // Expected it to be 'Error: Bad times on the internetz' instance
error: true
}
Did I write a wrong implementation? What should be the right way to get the error?
I want to be able to reduce the action with an error payload and save the error to the store for further steps (like showing a toast with the error message to the user)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Flux Standard Actions, which redux-actions providers helpers for, represent success and error "versions" of an action as the same action type. createAction() will create action-creator functions which accept either a value or an error object. When the code which may have success or error paths needs to dispatch an action, you can use the same action creator.
// action creators.jsconstreadDataCompleted=createAction('DATA/READ_COMPLETED`)// getdata.jsimport somethingHappened from './actions'import store from './store'try { const response = await fetch('some_url') if(!response.ok) throw new Error('Badtimesontheinternetz.')
const body = await response.json()
store.dispatch(somethingHappened(body))
}
catch (err) {
store.dispatch(somethingHappened(err))
}
Code similar to this will produce a "success" action when following the happy path:
{type: 'DATA/READ_COMPLETED',payload: /* ... your data ... */}
... and an 'error' action when following the error path:
{type: 'DATA/READ_COMPLETED',error: {message: 'Bad times on the internetz.'}}// well, it'll be a proper error object, not the pseudo-error object I wrote above.
This means that your reducers need to contain logic for handling the success and error states. You can roll your own, or use handleAction()/handleActions(), also included in the redux-actions library, to help create these "error aware" reducers. I'll leave you to look at the docs for handleAction().
I'm following the docs to implement
redux-actions
in a project.https://redux-actions.js.org/api/createaction#createactiontype
When I get to the error handling example:
I noticed that when I pass an error for testing, like this:
The action is now:
Did I write a wrong implementation? What should be the right way to get the error?
I want to be able to reduce the action with an error payload and save the error to the store for further steps (like showing a toast with the error message to the user)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: