Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

problems with Cattery fitting routines #37

Open
twillis449 opened this issue Nov 24, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

problems with Cattery fitting routines #37

twillis449 opened this issue Nov 24, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@twillis449
Copy link
Contributor

I'm having some problems getting fitting and calibration up and running
for base-line dependent averaging simullations. The following stuff is
available in my directory 'test_fitting' on Jake.

  1. I've created a 5 min long test observation at 0.1 sec sampling rate
    with 99 antennas (just taking every 2nd antenna from a comination of
    meerkat + SKA1). The MS is already created - ska1_orig.MS. Run the
    turbo-sim.py script to generate a noise-free sim of a 1 Jy point source
    at the fieid centre whose phase is perturbed by the ionosphre. The
    parameters are already set in the .tdl.conf so the sim will run correctly.

  2. OK - I try running calico-generic.py with the parameters given in
    the .tdl.conf file. Basically do a self-cal for each 0.1 sec time
    interval. (Note that I had to modify the standard supplied
    calico-generic script as the standard things like oms-gridded sky had
    been commented out.) Every thing works find for the first ~2500
    intefrations - phase is perfectly straightened out, but then the
    meqserver just goes 'poof' with no proper explanation except a status
    of -1, so the last 500 integrations are not calibrated! I get the same
    exact result if I use just a complete meercat 64 antenna configuration.
    From looking at the output of 'top', my computer is not running out of memory etc.

  3. Since calico-generic doesn't work, I try calico-stefcal.py
    (again modified to read in the oms-gridded-sky models). Here, stefcal
    seems to do some solving as a lot of stuff gets printed out on the
    terminal, but no calibration corrections are applied to the input data,
    and nothing appears in an inspector plot of the stefcal gains. I suspect
    that I'm not setting some flag here as I haven't used stefcal before -
    my current parameters are also in the .tdl.conf file. Could you please
    try a run and tell me what I'm not specifying correctly. Also I note that many of the stefcal parameters have no 'information' section associated with them so I don't have the slightest idea what they do.

So -- I'm stuck with the snail-like CASA gaincal and applycal routines until I can get one of these calibration schemes up and running. Advice needed!

@twillis449 twillis449 added the bug label Nov 24, 2015
@twillis449
Copy link
Contributor Author

RE: 2) above - I meant everything works fine for the first ~2500 integrations, and then the meqserver goes 'poof'!!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant