Creating an executable with run as a command

[KieranPringle]

I'm sure the title gives most of this away, but I've run into the following error and am looking for some way around it:

"run" is a Thor reserved word and cannot be defined as command

For context, I'm creating a build tool for internal use which creates workflows from config and then runs them, and run is the perfect word for this command.

Is there any lower-level Thor API manipulation I could do to get around this limitation? Something that would allow me to declare and register a command called run, still use the option and description declaration (even if that is also done by lower level API access), but avoid declaring it as a method called run in my class that extends Thor?

[Freakwill]

I'm sure the title gives most of this away, but I've run into the following error and am looking for some way around it:

"run" is a Thor reserved word and cannot be defined as command

For context, I'm creating a build tool for internal use which creates workflows from config and then runs them, and run is the perfect word for this command.

Is there any lower-level Thor API manipulation I could do to get around this limitation? Something that would allow me to declare and register a command called run, still use the option and description declaration (even if that is also done by lower level API access), but avoid declaring it as a method called run in my class that extends Thor?

See my issue
I thought we could implement a special method that need not call it explicitly in command line. It could be run or other proper words. I think it is also suitable for you.

[jethrodaniel]

👍 for this feature.

Easy enough to rename the library run into _run(just a suggestion). The same approach could easily let us use shell as a command as well.