You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi @jimhester - looks like you're the only one left maintaining this package, so sorry to both you 😏 I've got an issue with some src C code which contains no actual functions. This fails on the gcov call here:
Plus the console output of gcov has the extra line
#> '/tmp/RtmpT9LnNK/typetracer//src/utils.gcno:no functions found
There is no way to circumvent this, and thus no way to get package_coverage to succeed on this package, so any help would be appreciated! Just some kind of modification of the system_check shown above to return empty yet still succeed when no functions found?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @jimhester - looks like you're the only one left maintaining this package, so sorry to both you 😏 I've got an issue with some src C code which contains no actual functions. This fails on the
gcov
call here:covr/R/compiled.R
Lines 77 to 79 in caed186
because gcov errors when there are no executable lines. Here's a reprex based on this src file:
Created on 2023-06-23 with reprex v2.0.2
Plus the console output of gcov has the extra line
There is no way to circumvent this, and thus no way to get
package_coverage
to succeed on this package, so any help would be appreciated! Just some kind of modification of thesystem_check
shown above to return empty yet still succeed when no functions found?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: