Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support other term query format and support number term value. #3903

Closed

Conversation

fmassot
Copy link
Contributor

@fmassot fmassot commented Oct 2, 2023

Fix #3900.

Tests added.

The PR is a bit lame... I mostly copy pasted the code used to deserialize the match query and adapted it to the term query.
We may want to find a generic way of handling this... I suggest to not do it now unless there is an obvious way to do it (I'm not capable to see that right now).

@fmassot fmassot requested a review from guilload October 2, 2023 22:09
@fulmicoton
Copy link
Contributor

Can we prefer it #3906?

@fmassot fmassot closed this Oct 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Improper handling of TERM query
2 participants