Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor service pool in control plane service #3622

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2023

Conversation

imotov
Copy link
Collaborator

@imotov imotov commented Jul 11, 2023

Description

Replace ServiceClientPool with Pool in control plane services.

How was this PR tested?

Updated existing tests to ensure compatibility with the new pool.

Replace ServiceClientPool with Pool in control plane services.
@imotov imotov added the enhancement New feature or request label Jul 11, 2023
@imotov imotov requested a review from guilload July 11, 2023 09:45
@imotov imotov merged commit eef4a72 into main Jul 12, 2023
7 checks passed
@imotov imotov deleted the imotov/refactor-pool-in-control-plane branch July 12, 2023 01:35
imotov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
Introduces a distinct Control Plane component, which is now seperate
from the Indexing Scheduler.

See #3443
See #3622
imotov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
Introduces a distinct Control Plane component, which is now separate
from the Indexing Scheduler.

See #3443
See #3622
imotov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
Introduces a distinct Control Plane component, which is now separate
from the Indexing Scheduler.

See #3443
See #3622
imotov added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 13, 2023
Introduces a distinct Control Plane component, which is now separate
from the Indexing Scheduler.

See #3443
See #3622
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants