-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 334
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
show view range - match view extents #2245
Comments
It was intentional to use the level, because calculating a views outline can be tricky if it is not cropped. An alternative could be to use the view's outline if it is croped but fallback to the level's if it is not. |
I'd prefer that method - and that's what I would expect (using the view's Associated Level if no Crop Region). from the other thread: |
The extents of the crop is easy. If there is no crop the extents has to be calculated from the complete model and that is quite expensive. |
I've changed the code to use the views extents. Do we need the level's extents as a fallback, or should the UI warn about turning on the crop? I think the different behaviour for uncropped views can be confusing without explanation, and most of the views are cropped anyway. |
@thumDer I'd go for the warning IMHO |
I've also realized that I would need to combine that pre-check/warning with the 3d view's sectionbox check, because if the 3d view has a section box the script will use its extents for the planes, and the levels were only a fallback. So now the crop will be a fallback, and if there is none the warning will ask the user to turn on the section box OR the crop. Deal? |
@thumDer deal |
@jmcouffin Interesting. I don't have the imperial sample house right know, could you send it over to me somehow? |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vj5GuygVbzUShW91LJtvIp-ACSj20tkc/view?usp=sharing |
thanks, already fixed by 5ddd651 |
shall we close the issue? |
That fix I comitted is only for the elevation issue, I still need some time to finalize to crop based extents, only slight adjustments, safeguard mechanisms. |
done. should we close this manually or let it close itself on next release? |
Manually, that makes me feel better to see the number of issues going down, that's me liking things tidy🤭 |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
Trying to show users visually what is in a plan view
Describe the solution you'd like
Color planes should match what's shown in the view (not the extents of Level1)
Describe alternatives you've considered
grin & bear it :)
Additional context
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: