Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Small refactor after 3.12 support #2227

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 27, 2023
Merged

Conversation

DanielNoord
Copy link
Collaborator

Type of Changes

Type
βœ“ πŸ› Bug fix
βœ“ πŸ”¨ Refactoring

Description

Follow up to #2219.

I didn't get round to reviewing, but had some last nits. This brings the nodes a little bit more in line with the other nodes (I also don't like it, but let's stay consistent).
More importantly, it also fixes an issue with the typing. list[TypeVar, ParamSpec, ...] is incorrect as per:
image
https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html#annotating-tuples

@DanielNoord DanielNoord added Bug πŸͺ³ Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining astroid or the dev workflow labels Jun 27, 2023
@DanielNoord DanielNoord added this to the 3.0.0a6 milestone Jun 27, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 27, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #2227 (58b42be) into main (fef38f2) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2227   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.92%   92.93%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines       10918    10920    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits        10146    10148    +2     
  Misses        772      772           
Flag Coverage Ξ”
linux 92.73% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
pypy 91.07% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️
windows 92.50% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Ξ”
astroid/nodes/node_classes.py 95.56% <100.00%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

@jacobtylerwalls
Copy link
Member

Taking a look

Comment on lines -3378 to +3383
name: AssignName | None,
type_params: list[TypeVar, ParamSpec, TypeVarTuple],
name: AssignName,
type_params: list[TypeVar | ParamSpec | TypeVarTuple],
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ouch, thank you, I was just working too quickly.

Comment on lines +3358 to +3360
name: AssignName
type_params: list[TypeVar | ParamSpec | TypeVarTuple]
value: NodeNG
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not totally sure why we're adopting this pattern instead of using the constructor.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't like it as well, but I do think we should at least try and keep one style so that we can then refactor it to a desired style all at once?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No worries. Sometimes it seems like we prefer not to mass-replace, but not a big deal, let's keep moving. πŸ‘

@@ -2705,16 +2705,19 @@ class ParamSpec(_base_nodes.AssignTypeNode):
<ParamSpec l.1 at 0x7f23b2e4e198>
"""

_astroid_fields = ("name",)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I missed these because I went back and forth on whether this should be a str or an AssignName until I saw the references for the similar issue with MatchStar and friends pointing to python/cpython#88160.

Copy link
Member

@jacobtylerwalls jacobtylerwalls left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's ship it :-)

@DanielNoord DanielNoord merged commit d4f4452 into pylint-dev:main Jun 27, 2023
21 checks passed
@DanielNoord DanielNoord deleted the post-312 branch June 27, 2023 20:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug πŸͺ³ Maintenance Discussion or action around maintaining astroid or the dev workflow Unreleased
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants