Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implemented pybricks protocol v1.4.0 #2317

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Oct 27, 2024
Merged

Conversation

afarago
Copy link
Contributor

@afarago afarago commented Oct 8, 2024

Adding pybricks protocol v1.4.0 handling as a first step on to merge hubcenter feature in #2315.

chore: added ble-pybricks-service tests
fix: improved ArrayBuffer deep equality check
src/ble-pybricks-service/actions.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ble-pybricks-service/protocol.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ble-pybricks-service/sagas.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ble-pybricks-service/protocol.ts Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/ble-pybricks-service/sagas.test.ts Show resolved Hide resolved
@afarago
Copy link
Contributor Author

afarago commented Oct 25, 2024

Hi! I wanted to check in and see how the review is going on this PR. If there’s anything specific I can assist with or if you have any feedback, just let me know.

* Update for changed StartUserProgram command semantics
* Added new capability flags and fixed-purpose slot definitions
* Update for new start REPL command
* Updated StartUserProgram command and Status event for slots
* Added new AppData command and event
@dlech dlech merged commit 14f4716 into pybricks:master Oct 27, 2024
4 checks passed
@dlech
Copy link
Member

dlech commented Oct 27, 2024

There was still quite a bit to do and I had some time to work on it, so I went ahead and fixed it up.

@laurensvalk
Copy link
Member

Thanks both of you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants