You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This report is about the ProGit book, version 2, English language.
This bug is not about a translation or old version
Bug covers book website/pdf
I confirm the bug is about the book as found on the website/pdf
Problem is present in the Pro Git book on the website?
This bug also affects the Pro Git book as published on the website.
Which version of the book is affected?
Source files
Describe the bug:
What was supposed to be monospaced inline code is interpreted by asciidoctor for formatting characters, breaking in a few places. This affects PDF, EPUB, but NOT the HTML/website. I didn't check MOBI.
The solution is to either escape the formatting charcaters manually with backslash \ or instead use the literal monospace syntax: `+inline here+`
I suppose it's easier to mass replace single backticks with the new literal monospace syntax instead of hunting down all occurrences one by one? Personally I don't know the syntax of asciidoctor enough to do the latter, but the replacement seems easy enough.
Steps to reproduce:
Git Internals -> The Refspec, page 432 in PDF. The plus sign is missing and the paragraph has broken code formatting
Expected behavior:
Correct formatting
Screenshots:
Website (correct):
Epub (broken)
PDF (broken)
Additional context:
A comment by jnavila implies its the new syntax that the book wasn't adapted for. One single occurrence of this type of error was fixed in PR: #1300
refspec.asc:
The format of the refspec is, first, an optional `+`, followed by `<src>:<dst>`, where `<src>` is the pattern for references on the remote side and `<dst>` is where those references will be tracked locally.
The `+` tells Git to update the reference even if it isn't a fast-forward.
PS: Oh my such strict bug templates are a pain to adhere to, if you already typed it all out properly anyway...
Device
No response
Operating system
No response
Browser/application + version
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
There's no existing/similar bug report.
This report is about a single actionable bug.
This report is about the ProGit book, version 2, English language.
Bug covers book website/pdf
Problem is present in the Pro Git book on the website?
Which version of the book is affected?
Source files
Describe the bug:
What was supposed to be monospaced inline code is interpreted by asciidoctor for formatting characters, breaking in a few places. This affects PDF, EPUB, but NOT the HTML/website. I didn't check MOBI.
The solution is to either escape the formatting charcaters manually with backslash
\
or instead use the literal monospace syntax: `+inline here+`I suppose it's easier to mass replace single backticks with the new literal monospace syntax instead of hunting down all occurrences one by one? Personally I don't know the syntax of asciidoctor enough to do the latter, but the replacement seems easy enough.
Steps to reproduce:
Git Internals -> The Refspec, page 432 in PDF. The plus sign is missing and the paragraph has broken code formatting
Expected behavior:
Correct formatting
Screenshots:
Website (correct):
Epub (broken)
PDF (broken)
Additional context:
A comment by jnavila implies its the new syntax that the book wasn't adapted for. One single occurrence of this type of error was fixed in PR: #1300
refspec.asc:
PS: Oh my such strict bug templates are a pain to adhere to, if you already typed it all out properly anyway...
Device
No response
Operating system
No response
Browser/application + version
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: