format output

[chalmagean]

Hi, is there a way to format the output so that it can fit in the error buffer (when a test fails) or an easy way to visit each error without actually needing to switch to the error buffer and then pgup/pgdown to find the errors ?

[dgutov]

Not currently. Do you have an example of an Emacs mode that does something like that?'
We could adopt the approach.

[asok]

It's next-error and previous-error. By default binded to M-g n and
M-g p.

2013/12/16 Cezar Halmagean [email protected]

Hi, is there a way to format the output so that it can fit in the error
buffer (when a test fails) or an easy way to visit each error without
actually needing to switch to the error buffer and then pgup/pgdown to find
the errors ?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/73
.

[dgutov]

Ah, ok. That shouldn't be hard to do.

[chalmagean]

Looks like focussing the first error should be easy with next-error (or something similar) ? (Thanks @asok)

[dgutov]

Or rather, it already works. @asok I guess that was a reply to the original question.

The main problem of these commands, I guess, is that they visit each backtrace line. Typing M-g n twice won't bring you to the second failing example, but to the second line of the first failure's backtrace.

[asok]

@dgutov yup I was answering the original question. But as you said, that will actually not bring you to the next failing example only to the next error in the backtrace.