Replies: 1 comment
-
@peterdsharpe, any thoughts on this ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
I have been using Aerosandbox in my projects and find the
aerosandbox.numpy
library particularly valuable for handling CasADi and NumPy interactions seamlessly. I have noticed that when starting a new project, there is often a dilemma of whether to make a copy of aerosandbox.numpy or depend on the entire Aerosandbox ecosystem when I only needaerosandbox.numpy
. I believe that this functionality could benefit a broader audience if offered as a standalone library.Proposal
I would like to suggest the creation of a separate repository to house the
aerosandbox.numpy
library independently. This would allow users to utilize the powerful capabilities ofaerosandbox.numpy
in various projects without necessarily depending on the entirety of the Aerosandbox ecosystem (e.g., aerodynamics, structure, etc.).Benefits
aerosandbox.numpy
as a standalone library, users can easily integrate it into projects with diverse requirements, providing greater flexibility in usage.aerosandbox.numpy
could attract a wider user base, including those working on projects unrelated to aerodynamics or structural analysis.aerosandbox.numpy
from the main Aerosandbox repository can simplify maintenance and updates, making it more agile and adaptable to evolving needs.aerosandbox.numpy
or depending on the entire Aerosandbox ecosystem when starting a new project. A standaloneaerosandbox.numpy
would offer a solution to this dilemma.I would be happy to contribute to the creation and maintenance of this standalone repository. I believe it could enhance the overall Aerosandbox ecosystem and make this powerful tool even more accessible to the community.
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions