Drop removed packages from CentOS Stream 10 and RHEL 10.

[achilleas-k]

data/defs/centos-10: drop removed packages

These packages are no longer part of CentOS Stream 10 (or RHEL 10).

---

test: run tests with centos-bootc:stream10 as well

Rename TestCaseCentos to TestCaseS9S and add a TestCaseC10S.

---

[henrywang]

LGTM. Thanks!

[achilleas-k]

osinfo-detect on the C10S ISO just returns

Media is bootable.

which is making a test fail. I don't know if that's a bug or something we should change in tests.

[achilleas-k]

osinfo-detect on the C10S ISO just returns

Media is bootable.

which is making a test fail. I don't know if that's a bug or something we should change in tests.

@mmartinv I assume this depends on the version of libosinfo and what distro versions it knows about. Would it make sense to skip (or adapt) the test for CentOS Stream 10 or should this be working already?

[mmartinv]

osinfo-detect on the C10S ISO just returns

Media is bootable.

which is making a test fail. I don't know if that's a bug or something we should change in tests.

@mmartinv I assume this depends on the version of libosinfo and what distro versions it knows about. Would it make sense to skip (or adapt) the test for CentOS Stream 10 or should this be working already?

It looks like CentOS Stream 10 is not in osinfo-db (because it's not release yet I guess..): https://gitlab.com/libosinfo/osinfo-db/-/tree/main/data/os/centos.org?ref_type=heads

[mmartinv]

@achilleas-k this PR will conflict with #680. I like the of moving the osinfo_template logic to a function instead of putting it on each test case.

[achilleas-k]

@achilleas-k this PR will conflict with #680. I like the of moving the osinfo_template logic to a function instead of putting it on each test case.

Right. Let's get that one in first then and I'll adapt this one accordingly.

Thanks for the heads-up!