simulation issue [solved] #1741
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
thanks for the note! could you send the mesher output file to see how the mesh evaluation looked liked? in your setup, there are likely some distorted crustal elements affecting the stability. the DT have all been chosen empirically and as big as possible to avoid unnecessary computational costs. unfortunately, that's not working in all possible setups. did you know that you could add a line in the Par_file to override the emprical DT value? by setting
with a value you think should be stable, you can re-run the simulation without the need of modifying the source code file. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
thanks for the output! I notice that you use an older code version. could you also use the most recent |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I recently tried running a forward simulation using SPECFEM3D_GLOBE, but encountered the following error:
I used the s362ani model with CRUST1.0 and set up the following chunk parameters:
I was able to fix the issue by reducing the time step (DT). In the file /shared/get_timestep_and_layers.f90, between lines 479-499, I found this section:
When I removed line 494, which modifies the time step for a three-layer regional Moho mesh
, the simulation ran smoothly. I think this issue might need further attention.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions