Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create 2024-sd-jwt-kotlin-annual.md #171

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
39 changes: 39 additions & 0 deletions docs/projects/reviews/2024/2024-sd-jwt-kotlin-annual.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
# 2024 sd-jwt-kotlin (SD-JWT Implementation)

## Project Health

The main focus of this project was to provide a Kotlin implementation for the
IETF SD-JWT draft. However, the project remains without any updates for a while and
the maintainer decided to post an announcement stating this project is no longer maintained.
However during TAC meeting for annual review, there was a volunteer stepped up to
take care of this project.


## Maintainer Diversity

As before, the project is maintained by a single maintainer.
It's expected to have a single maintainer for the next year as well.

## Project Adoption

This project was used by German Bundesdruckerei but not sure they are still using.

## Goals

### Performance Against Prior Goals

The project implemented with success to its initial goal but not well maintained or used.

### Next Year's Goals

This project aims to have a cloned copy of eudi-reference-wallet-sdjwt to have every language
implementation stays under OWF umbrella.
Comment on lines +29 to +30
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Based on the discussion in the July 10th TAC meeting, it is important to note whether this will be a fork or a mirror. If it is a fork, how will it be different? If it is a mirror, is there a need for it or should we only have the redirect in the README?


## Help Required

The project is maintainable with one maintainer and no further aid is needed.
We are planning to automate the process (maybe using github actions).
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth adding this as a goal for next year (although, at the same time, you may be asking for help from the community for automating).


## Project Lifecycle Stage Recommendation

The project is recommended to remain in the Labs stage.
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions docs/projects/reviews/2024/index.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@ Projects must provide an [annual review](../../../governance/project-annual-revi

| Project | Stage | Date Accepted | 2024 Review |
| ----------------------------- | ------ | ------------- | ------------ |
| [SD-JWT Python](./2024-sd-jwt-python-annual.md) | Labs | May 27, 2023 | Jun 12, 2024 |
| SD-JWT Kotlin | Labs | May 27, 2023 | Jun 12, 2024 |
| [SD-JWT Python](./2024-sd-jwt-python-annual.md) | Labs | May 27, 2023 | Jun 12, 2024 |
| [SD-JWT Kotlin](./2024-sd-jwt-kotlin-annual.md) | Labs | May 27, 2023 | Jun 12, 2024 |
| Farmworker Wallet OS | Labs | Aug 9, 2023 | Aug 21, 2024 |
| VC-API | Labs | Sep 28, 2023 | Oct 2, 2024 |
| Wallet Framework .NET | Labs | Oct 4, 2023 | Oct 16, 2024 |
Expand Down